data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2a69/a2a6942a6906dc1f05a841c3d740f36286f45056" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e680/3e680b659cbbb42bf37210dab8abfd5b7c56feba" alt=""
Unfortunately, his attempts at doing something good end are unsolicited and somewhat terrifying.His journal entries, read effectively in a conversational sort of dictation by De Niro, hint at things deeply felt and unsatisfied. The narration is the eeriest part of the film, and I couldn't help thinking that Travis was the basis for Watchmen's Rorschach, the character also expressing through a journal a loathing for the rotting city and a capacity for violence.
And when that violence plays out, it's haunting. Like other Scorsese films I've seen, the violence is given full screen time, with no hiding. In this case, the violence is bloody and sloppy.By the end of it, we see a birds-eye-view of the scene that almost lovingly goes over each body, each bullet wound. I'm never sure how Scorsese feels about violence--whether or not he condones it, because he never seems to outright condemn it--and this film is no exception. Although for me, Taxi Driver is at least disturbing in idea, if not emotion toward the violence.
However, I was excited by a few of the roles. Cybill Shepherd as Betsy was able to play a professional campaigner who is self-assured which is refreshing seeing as how I haven't been too please with some of the female roles in Marty's movies. Betsy knows what she will and will not take. When she decides she doesn't want to see Travis anymore, she doesn't. Also, Albert Brooks as Tom also makes an appearance as a fellow campaigner with Betsy. It was one of those pleasing cinematic moments when a comedic actor does well within the context of a very dark and serious drama. And while I'd heard a lot about Jodi Foster in this film, she's more like a placeholder, another example of Travis' inability of really helping people. His solutions are in violence, and that, obviously, isn't always the answer.
By the end of the film, we see that Travis is lauded as a hero. It seems only the film's audience who was privy to his journals and private acts know that it probably wasn't just heroism that motivated his actions; something is terribly wrong with him, but we don't know what. We end up asking, what happens if he reaches that breaking point again?
I think this is one of those love'm or leave'm kind of films. I watched it in a "Films of the 70s" class at BYU and the discussion that followed is what really sealed my love for this movie. There's just so many ways to watch it and reading your post on it reemphasized this for me.
ReplyDeleteSince Travis starts off narrating I was drawn in by the conflict between reality in the film and Travis' twisted perspective. I absolutely loved the ending because it continued on that vein. You never actually see the resolution described in the letters, you just hear Travis reading them, so you never can tell whether it really happened or not. Also the film noir allusion in the beginning is awesome. I'm glad you saw it. :)
A few years ago I rented this movie and was in the last ten minutes when the DVD gave up. I couldn't get it to play on my computer or anything. I brought it back in desperation to the video store, but that was their only copy and were infuriatingly unsympathetic to my plight. I have still never seen the end. FML
ReplyDeleteLauren--frowny face. Also, what an awkward place to stop.
ReplyDelete